Category Archives: Immigration

UK Authorities Ignore 1,400 Non-Muslim Children Repeatedly Attacked By Muslim Rape Gangs

Saudi writer Abdulah Mohammad Al Dawood urges followers to sexually molest women for working at public places

A chilling report has emerged that details the atrocities that at least 1,400 non-Muslim children faced at the hands of Muslims for 16 years in Great Britain because authorities feared they would be viewed as racist.

BBC reports that children as young as 11 were beaten, trafficked and raped by large numbers of men between 1997 and 2013 in Rotherham, South Yorkshire, according to a review into child protective services. The worst part is that over a third of the cases were known by authorities, who were afraid to speak up because of the ethnic and religious backgrounds of the attackers.

“Several staff described their nervousness about identifying the ethnic origins of perpetrators for fear of being thought racist,” according to the report’s author, Professor Alexis Jay.

Jay blamed the “blatant” collective failures of the council’s leadership and concluded that “It is hard to describe the appalling nature of the abuse that child victims suffered.”

Authorities Ignore 1,400 Non-Muslim Children Repeatedly Attacked By Muslim Rape Gangs

The chilling details of Jay’s report revealed:

Victims were doused in petrol and threatened with being set alight, terrorized with guns, made to witness brutally-violent rapes and told they would be the next if they spoke out.

They were raped by multiple perpetrators, trafficked to other towns and cities in the north of England, abducted, beaten and intimidated.

One victim described gang rape as “a way of life”

Police “regarded many child victims with contempt”

Some fathers tried to rescue their children from abuse but were arrested themselves;
The approximate figure of 1,400 abuse victims is likely to be a conservative estimate of the true scale of abuse.

The majority of the perpetrators were Pakistani, according to Jay’s report. Because of this, others wouldn’t report alleged abuses out of fear they’d be labeled as racist.

Follow Us On Pinterest
One of the victims said that “gang rape” became a way of life for some of the girls who grew up in Rotherham with her. Fathers would also try to track down their daughters to remove them from the homes where they were abused only to be arrested after the police were called to the scene.

According to Jay, the systematic failures within CPS happened despite three reports between 2002 and 2006, that both the council and police were aware of, “which could not have been clearer in the description of the situation in Rotherham.”

Jay says that the first of the reports were “effectively suppressed” because senior officials denied the data was true, and the other two reports were just flat out ignored. Councillors seemed to dismiss the reports as isolated incidents even though they documented widespread abuse.

“Others remembered clear direction from their managers not to [acknowledge the reports],” according to Jay.

Many of the victims believed that the perpetrators were their boyfriends who would shower them with gifts, drugs and alcohol. Some of them still don’t even believe that they were victims of abuse and groomed for sexual pleasure.

Some of the victims had serious mental issues and others from broken homes. Almost all of them had dysfunctional families with parents that suffered from addiction, sexually abused or would beat them.

The girls were eventually rescued by police and taken out of the abusive homes after being monitored by CPS, but it was too little too late.

“I was a child and they should have stepped in,” one of the victims said.

“No matter what’s done now… it’s not going to change that it was too late, it should have been stopped and prevented.”

You can read the full report here.

Facebooktwitterrss

Obama’s “Outreach Summits” To Muslims In America: “Place Your Orders Now. We Cater.”

new class of nobility in america

A series of Muslim Outreach Summits are planned coast-to-coast by the Obama administration to get feedback from Muslims on how the government can better serve them and their specific desires.

The president’s adopted home town of Chicago will be the first stop.

You know, there’s a reason for the separation of church and state thingy that the Constitution establishes. It’s not that I specifically don’t think the government should reach out to Muslims. I don’t think the government should reach out to any religions… Why is the government going to cater to some religions like Muslims and then demonize others (currently Christians)?

What in the world does religion have to do with government? In the past several decades numerous lawsuits have been won against schools and courthouses who had historic biblical references such as the ten commandments hanging on a wall. The reason? Stuff that has to do with religion, churches, God, etc, just simply don’t belong in places that are paid for by tax dollars. No one should force their religious views on others, but the government certainly shouldn’t be allowed to force a religious view on others. The government isn’t allowed to promote religious symbolism or ideologies. Too much intermingling of public funding and religious ideology for the comfort of many atheists.

Yet no one minds when the federal government decides that Muslims are now the new “in crowd” and begins to cater to their desires and decides that Christians are now the fabled “step child”. Should the government be catering to anyone? Should the government even care what religion you are? No! Catering costs money… Just ask a wedding planner.

So let’s get this straight: You can’t cater to Christians because the government is never supposed to intermingle between religions and government-run, taxpayer-funded organizations. It’s unconstitutional and unfair. However, the government needs to reach out to Muslims because they need to have their needs met by government programs and need to be made to feel right at home in America.

And now, at least one school is putting prayer back in school… but only for Muslims… What gives?

Obama’s “Outreach Summits” To Muslims In America: “Tell Me What  You Want”

new class of nobility in americaWND initially discovered documents referring to the Muslim summits  while examining a U.S. Department of Education procurement of data-gathering and report-writing services.

The services are specific to information being assembled by the White House Initiative on Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders, or WHIAAPI, which Obama created via executive order in 2009.

Upon closer inspection, however, WND learned that the Education Department explicitly will direct the selected contractor to chronicle findings and recommendations gleaned from the Muslim Outreach Summits.

The White House views this year’s venues as an extension of a previous outreach to “new immigrants and refugees – some of the most underserved in the AAPI community,” according to a document titled “WHIAAPI 2013 Faith-Based and Community Engagement.”

Complementing the prior effort will be the three “regional convenings,” tentatively scheduled June 15 in Chicago, June 22 in San Francisco and June 29 in New York City.

“These cities are main AAPI immigrant hubs and entry points for new immigrants/refugees,” according to a related document, “Questions Received from Vendors: Development and Preparation of the AAPI Annual Report to the President.”

“Each convening with [sic] include panel discussions/workshops with federal officials on key issues impacting the community and also an open-dialogue session to hear directly from the community about issues of concern.”

One vendor submitted a question to the Education Department asking, “Is there separate authorizing legislation for the Muslim Outreach Summits, or is it included in the AAPI EO [Executive Order]?”

The department, in response, acknowledged that separate authorizing legislation does not exist.

Rather, it says that Obama crafted the initiative solely through executive order, which it justified because the endeavor’s goal is to “improve the quality of life of AAPIs through increased participation in federal programs in which AAPIs may be underserved.”

The vendor-question document further states that Obama’s “faith-based outreach summits” will help the government to provide federal resources to “underserved AAPIs” while determining their ongoing needs.

When Obama signed the executive order Oct. 14, 2009, he also launched a separate President’s Advisory Commission on AAPI as well as a Federal Interagency Working Group.

The groups work collaboratively with the White House Office of Public Engagement and federal agencies “to increase Asian American and Pacific Islander participation.”

“The initiative seeks to highlight both the tremendous unmet needs in the Asian American and Pacific Islander communities as well as the dynamic community assets that can be leveraged to meet many of those needs.”

It hopes to address the needs of those communities by increasing participation in a broad swath of programs, such as those involving art, business, education, environmental and justice programs.

Sometime after the three Muslim Outreach Summits, the chosen contractor will develop and then present its summary report to the president and to newly appointed WHIAAPI commissioners.

The contracting action – the first of its kind since its inception in 2008 – will help lay the foundation for the initiative’s future work, the document says.

 

http://www.wnd.com/2013/05/obama-to-muslims-tell-me-what-you-want/#YYUDOWm77bJyWQmz.01

Facebooktwitterrss

The U.S. Wrongfully Deports Its Own Citizens | Especially Minorities or Handicapped Persons

govt is here to help deport citizens and import criminals

 The United States Immigration service has wrongfully deported United States citizens more than once. In this instance it was a handicapped person named Mark Lyttle, but I recall a similar situation a few years ago in which a 14 year old African-American girl was deported even though she didn’t match the description of the person who immigration was looking for. She was black instead of Mexican, the wrong height and weight,  didn’t speak Spanish and was several years younger than the person in the immigration file.

Her grandmother searched relentlessly until she found evidence that she was alive in Mexico. I would say that there is a likelihood that many US citizens that have wrongfully been deported don’t have a grandmother or anyone else relentlessly searching for them. Such people’s stories are probably doomed to end up in cold case / missing persons files in storage offices of law enforcement forgotten.

As if this wouldn’t be bad enough, the Obama administration is accused of refusing to deport illegal immigrants who commit crimes including violent crimes and sexual assault.

Incidentally, what an absolutely brilliant use of taxpayer money:

 In Lyttle’s case, the government spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to detain him, prosecute his removal proceedings and litigate against his federal court case—brought by the ACLU Immigrants’ Rights Project, the ACLU of Georgia, the ACLU of North Carolina, and pro bono lawyers including the law firm of Troutman Sanders—and ultimately pay him monetary damages.

 

Yes, the U.S. Wrongfully Deports Its Own Citizens

By Esha Bhandari, Equal Justice Works Fellow, ACLU at 11:48am

This week’s New Yorker features the harrowing ordeal of Mark Lyttle, a U.S. citizen with mental disabilities who was deported to Mexico. Lyttle was born in North Carolina and has psychiatric and cognitive disabilities. He was inexplicably referred to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in 2008 after being misidentified as an undocumented immigrant from Mexico even though he had never been to Mexico, shared no Mexican heritage, and did not speak any Spanish. As the New Yorker article notes, “Lyttle is brown-skinned,” and “the vagaries of race and ethnicity obviously played a part” in causing him to be singled out for immigration enforcement.

ICE detained Lyttle for 51 days, despite substantial evidence that he is a U.S. citizen, and put him in removal proceedings, where he was forced to defend himself without ever having the assistance of a lawyer. Lyttle was ordered removed in December 2008, and forced to cross the Mexican border on foot with only $3 in his pocket. Lyttle endured 125 days wandering through Mexico, Honduras, Nicaragua, and Guatemala, sleeping in streets and shelters, and even being imprisoned in a Honduran jail, before he was finally referred to a U.S. consular officer in Guatemala who actually listened to his story. The officer obtained confirmation of Lyttle’s U.S. citizenship by calling one of his brothers who serves in the U.S. military. Only through the extensive efforts of Lyttle’s family and a lawyer was he finally able to return.

Lyttle’s tale is unfortunately far from unique. Although no exact numbers exist, ICE regularly detains and deports U.S. citizens without ever providing them with a lawyer. And the U.S. continues to run a system of detention and deportation that fails adequately to protect the rights of vulnerable individuals like Lyttle.

The New Yorker article by William Finnegan, “The Deportation Machine,” highlights many of the continuing systemic problems with ICE policies, including its use of the flawed Secure Communities program, the prevalence of racial profiling, and the lack of any right to appointed counsel for individuals in immigration court. This lack of counsel is particularly problematic for people such as Lyttle, who, because of their mental disabilities, may not understand the immigration proceeding enough to be able to represent themselves adequately.

 The government is here to help - deport citizens and import criminals

The government is here to help – deport citizens and import criminals

Although Lyttle was eventually able to return home with the help of a lawyer, not all those who are wrongfully deported have access to the same resources. In Lyttle’s case, the government spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to detain him, prosecute his removal proceedings and litigate against his federal court case—brought by the ACLU Immigrants’ Rights Project, the ACLU of Georgia, the ACLU of North Carolina, and pro bono lawyers including the law firm of Troutman Sanders—and ultimately pay him monetary damages. However, the government has never admitted any wrongdoing, nor has it put in place procedures sufficient to ensure that this cannot happen to others.

On Tuesday a federal district judge ordered the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the Attorney General, and the Executive Office of Immigration Review to provide legal representation to immigrant detainees with mental disabilities who are facing deportation and who are unable to adequately represent themselves in immigration hearings. The ruling in the class-action lawsuit Franco-Gonzalez v. Holder is the first of its kind for immigrant detainees, who often languish in detention facilities for years without legal representation.

While a landmark victor, this ruling only applies to people in California, Arizona, and Washington. More is still need to protect the constitutional rights of those particularly vulnerable to mistakes caused by ICE’s aggressive enforcement tactics. As Mark Lyttle’s case demonstrates, the risk of wrongful detention and deportation is all too real for U.S. citizens and immigrants alike.

http://www.aclu.org/blog/immigrants-rights/yes-us-wrongfully-deports-its-own-citizens

Facebooktwitterrss
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!