Category Archives: Medical

Your Right to Bodily Self-Government is under Attack

Pediatric Physician Claims Authority to Override Individual’s Right to Self-Government

A recognized pediatric doctor who specializes in vaccination research would like to get the federal government on his side to help him turn his profitable and authoritarian medical agenda into law.  Dr. Paul Offit is not only a prominent pediatric doctor, he is also a physician who holds financial interests with the manufacturers of the same vaccines which he wants to be required by law.  You can read all about him at his own website.

Here’s the kicker:  Dr. Offit proposes also proposes the total elimination of all spiritual and religious exemptions for vaccinations.  That means that anyone who disagrees with government sanctioned medical opinions about the need for vaccinations would be simply overridden. Submit to injection of a foreign substance into your body, or face criminal penalties.

Land of Liberty?

Such a level of authority raises individual liberty concerns with Americans.   Two schools of thought stand in opposition to unquestionable government mandated medical authority.

One faction 0f opposition not only doubts the effectiveness of vaccines, but is highly suspicious of their content for a variety of medical reasons.  Another faction of opposition is largely ignored and unknown.  This faction  objects to vaccinations on the basis of religious and spiritual interpretations of human life which are often contrary to the conclusions of medical science.

Both camps rally around the same point, namely:

Does any person or group of persons possesses any real authority over the life of any other well- meaning person?

Don’t get me wrong.  I am not at all speaking in opposition to the well-meaning humanitarian efforts of the best of medical scientists and practitioners, but by what authority does any single human being’s conclusions rule the individual lives of other well meaning human beings?

Excuse me, but when did medical science prove itself to be 100% infallible and always correct?  Countless intelligent and qualified physicians and researchers continually contradict one another’s conclusions.  Once again, I’m not at all out to discredit anyone in medicine, but I do ask,  but from whence comes the conjecture that any singular medical opinion is superior to all others?

The medically admitted dangers of vaccinations

The best medical authorities freely admit that they might never know all that there is to know about the causes of disease.  The effectiveness of treatments and vaccines consistently and sometimes inexplicably change over time, and even the best medical experts can even be sure why.

No single physician’s knowledge is flawless or absolute

The medical community is comprised of many intelligent thinkers, each independently working to deduce the causes of diseases and suggest effective of cures and vaccines.  Who is capable of judging any of them to be absolutely correct?

Medical conclusions about the safety of vaccines are far from final and are never unquestionably conclusive or final.  Brand new facts and findings about the effectiveness and dangers of vaccines are continually discovered. The best medical researchers admit that medical science is in a state of continual flux, always evolving, always changing.

Medical opinion, therefore, is neither comprised of absolute knowledge nor does it have absolute authority over anyone or anything.

Governmental Claims to Authority

Today’s American population is trained and conditioned by an educational process that teaches its subjects to look to our government as the provider of the solution to every societal problem.  As a result, individual rights and personal liberty are too often exchanged for the illusion of the government’s provision of protection.  The Center for Disease Control has come to be looked upon by the public as able to provide us with infallible direction, and that perception is pure politically driven illusion.

The fact is, the CDC is only a group of mortal  human beings.  No agency exists which is qualified to grant authority to any individual (or to any group of individuals) in the interest of their own collective common good.

The First Amendment and Religious Freedom

Dr. Paul Offit wields political influence in the medical world.  He presently is demanding that everyone be forced into receiving the vaccines that he recommends, and profits from.  He claims that his knowledge on the subject of vaccination trumps any and all opposing medical or spiritual knowledge,  and that therefore spiritual and religious exemptions are invalid.  Dr. Offit is actively is campaigning to remove the right to refuse vaccination, regardless of reason.

The Constitution of The United States of America recounts the inalienable rights granted by God to men.  Our rights are not granted by the decisions of other human beings.  Our rights are an inherent part of our being.

Because some readers may profess atheism, let’s state it another way.  You are in charge of yourself and of your own body.  No other human being can claim a valid authority over your right to govern your own mind and body.

The First Amendment reads:  “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

Dear Dr. Offit:

Dr. Offit, it is clear that my religious beliefs conflict with your demands and wishes to control me and my body.  However the US Constitution says that you simply can do nothing about that.  No law shall prohibit the free exercise of my religion.  The “greater good” cannot prohibit my right to exercise my religion.   The word shall means what it says – it shall not happen.  I shall not trade the right to control my own body for your perception of a “greater good”

I, as a self governed human being, am as free to disagree with the conclusions of medical science as you are, or anyone else is, to agree with them.  There simply is no authority outside of myself that can outrank the authority that I possess to govern myself, and that every other American possesses to govern themselves.

I believe that I speak for every American by virtue of the Bill of Rights.

Facebooktwitterrss

Could required Ebola vaccinations be coming?

ebola vaccinations

Mandatory Ebola Vaccinations ?

Might it become necessary to require universal Ebola vaccinations to control the state of health of the population at large?  Though there is not yet a trusted vaccine available to counter Ebola, and though there is no immediate need to fear such a requirement, the question clearly brings attention to the possibility of abuse of government authority.

Does the individual maintain an absolute right to govern his own life?  If a vaccine were approved, what if the CDC insisted that its refusal would endanger others?  How are citizens outside of the medical community to know the absolute truth about vaccines? Who has the authority to determine the absolute truth about vaccines?

Disclaimer!

“I am not a medical authority of any kind, and at this point, no Ebola vaccination exists.”

Watch out for the last point.  Be suspicious of the CDC’s approval if a miracle vaccine suddenly surfaces, and if Ebola actually appears to become a real pandemic. Neither possibility is likely in my opinion, but you know what they say about opinions.

Thinking outside the box

If you’re a fan of thinking outside the traditional box, here are some ideas to consider.  They may help you decide what to do if Ebola did become a pandemic.

Medical epidemics and pandemics are naturally accompanied by public fear.  An epidemic becomes a pandemic in the same proportion as  fear of the disease.

So, fear and disease definitely  go together.  How might they be related?

Medical traditionalists hold that fear is a natural and expected consequence of disease, but that fear exists independently of the disease itself.  Fear is generally thought of as a mental effect of disease, rather than having anything to do with its causation.  An increasing number of medical thinkers disagree.  They subscribe to the existence of a distinct mind-body-health relationship which reverses the accepted assignments of cause and effect to fear and disease.

The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle

Just so you don’t think this is theoretical hearsay, recognized and respected scientific evidence exists to support the proposition that matter does not act independently of the thoughts and expectations of its observers.

The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle is widely accepted in the scientific community.  It was discovered in particle physics experiment.  Heisenberg noted that a particle’s behavior changes as it is measured, and that the results of scientific experiments involving the behavior of matter are not independent of their observer.  Without mental observation, matter is likely to act in uncertain ways that are different than it would act if it were not being measured. Experimental results are likely to change in uncertain ways.  The ways that particles act have been shown to be related to their observation, which must be carried out by an observer.


What does that have to do with epidemics and pandemics?

What does that point of view do for the credibility of vaccines produced by experimenters, each entertaining various expectations as they observe the actions which their vaccines produce on their subjects?  At the least, it makes the results uncertain!

That opens up a whole new direction for discussion I’m going to avoid here, but the point to be made is that there is never anything absolutely certain about medical observations and conclusions.  No individual has the right to impose his claim to medical authority over another individual.

What about individual rights?

I hold every individual  is self- governed.  Our authority and accountability are to God, or if you hold atheistic views, to your own self.  There is no natural accountability of one human being to another.  It is up to each and every one of us to decide for ourselves whether or not we choose to hand over our accountability to another agency outside of ourselves.

On this basis, our human government has only the authority we willingly grant to it.  From a traditional medical perspective, I think it irrational for us to expect that the  CDC would be more capable of managing the control of disease than would  the self governed individuals who are researching vaccines.

From a historical perspective, granting control to government agencies to control and contain emergencies has never proven effective.  Just look, for example, at the list of abuses, blunders, and mistakes associated with FEMA relief after Hurricane Katrina in 2005 in New Orleans.

Don’t give up your sovereignty!

On the other hand, it’s up to you as a self governed being to decide for yourself if you want to place you trust in the hands of the self proclaimed authority of federal aid.  Do you maintain complete and full trust that whatever preventative actions are decided upon by the CDC are absolutely correct?  If so, in the event of the perceived need to require vaccinations, if you were to submit, you would be placing your life in their hands.  To submit to government authority is to become willingly enslaved to their requirements, and to sacrifice your own sovereign state of being for theirs. You may be permanently giving up your right to govern your own life and your own future. Not only that – you may be risking your own life.

On the other hand, if you plan to continue to exercise your accountability to God (or to yourself, depending on how you look at it) you will probably refuse to comply with government mandated medical requirements which you already distrust.  I maintain that the greatest danger to Americans in the presence of any emergency is the attempt to remove our own right to decide what is good for our own lives in exchange for that illusive “greater good” that socialists believe in so deeply.

Should you choose to refuse a required vaccination, you would most likely be publicly ridiculed and accuse of being a carrier of disease and a danger to society.  If you are sure of yourself, and you know where your accountability really lies, would it be better to stand your ground, or to conform to a false authority and risk your own downfall?

Facebooktwitterrss

The SHOCKING DETAILS of The UN & Their US Funded CHILD SEX SLAVES

Wave after wave of child abuse reports pour forward from all over the globe
Steve Watson
Infowars.net
Wednesday, January 3, 2007
The UN is to investigate itself again after it was revealed by the London Telegraph today that more than twenty different cases of child sex slavery involving UN staff have been reported in southern Sudan.
The Telegraph reports that it has learned of dozens of victims’ accounts claiming that some peacekeeping and civilian staff based in the town are regularly picking up young children in their UN vehicles and forcing them to have sex. The Telegraph states that it is thought that hundreds of children may have been abused.
pedophile-un-video-info-wars-2007-cynthia-mckinney-grills-on-contractor-doing-it-and-not-getting-in-troubkeThe UN has up to 10,000 military personnel in the region, of all nationalities and the allegations involve peacekeepers, military police and civilian staff.
The Telegraph also states that the Sudanese government, which is deeply opposed to the deployment of UN troops to Darfur, has evidence of child sex slavery, including video footage of Bangladeshi UN workers allegedly having sex with three young girls.
Stating that such events are ultimately the work of “a few bad apples”, a UN spokesperson promised that they will be thoroughly investigated.
Over the past few years, however, there seems to have been a hell of a lot of rotting fruit in the UN barrel.
Last November a BBC Investigation found that children as young as 11 have been subjected to rape and prostitution by United Nations peacekeepers in Haiti and Liberia. A previous BBC investigation in Liberia discovered systematic abuse, involving food being given out to teenage refugees in return for sex. In both instances the UN promised to investigate.
In 2003 the AP reported that UN officials were identified as using a ship charted for ‘peacekeepers’ to traffick young girls from Thailand to East Timor as prostitutes.
In the same year it was also revealed that UN staff were guilty of raping women on a systematic scale in Sierra Leone.
Previous to this, in early 2002 a massive pedophilia scandal within the UN was uncovered involving sexual abuse against West African refugee children in Sierra Leone, Liberia and Guinea. UPI reported that Senior U.N. officials knew of the widespread pedophilia and not only did they not take action against the perpetrators, they covered up the atrocities.
It was later reported that after The UN’s’ investigating arm had cleared several U.N. workers of charges of sexual abuse against West African refugee children, it substantiated 10 new cases against aid workers.

Damning cases involving workers making home porn movies and so called weapons inspectors having bizarre sadomasochistic, pansexual and leather fetishes also emerged at this time.
In 2004 The New York Post reported that the UN was trying to block the publication of a book by three United Nations fieldworkers that detailed sex, drugs and corruption inside multiple U.N. missions. “Emergency Sex and Other Desperate Measures: A True Story from Hell on Earth” chronicles the experiences of a doctor, a human-rights official and a secretary in U.N. operations in Cambodia, Somalia, Haiti, Rwanda, Liberia and Bosnia. It also alleged that the UN knowingly hired freed criminals to serve as peacemakers.
We have also previously reported on the intimate involvement of Dyncorp, the contractors of the international police force, in such sex scandals. One Dyncorp employee, Kathryn Bolkovac, was sacked for detailing UN workers’ involvement in the sex trade in Bosnia. Bolkovac was sacked after disclosing that UN peacekeepers went to nightclubs where girls as young as 15 were forced to dance naked and have sex with customers, and that UN personnel and international aid workers were linked to prostitution rings in the Balkans.
Dyncorp was ordered to pay Kathryn Bolkovac £110,000 by an employment tribunal, yet both the British and the US governments as well as the UN continue to contract Dyncorp.
It was later revealed by the Chicago Tribune that Halliburton subsidiary KBR and Dyncorp lobbyists are working in tandem with the Pentagon to stall legislation that would specifically ban trafficking in humans for forced labor and prostitution by U.S. contractors.
On March 11th 2005, Representative Cynthia McKinney grilled Secretary Rumsfeld and General Myers on the Dyncorp scandal.
“Mr. Secretary, I watched President Bush deliver a moving speech at the United Nations in September 2003, in which he mentioned the crisis of the sex trade. The President called for the punishment of those involved in this horrible business. But at the very moment of that speech, Dyncorp was exposed for having been involved in the buying and selling of young women and children. While all of this was going on, Dyncorp kept the Pentagon contract to administer the smallpox and anthrax vaccines, and is now working on a plague vaccine through the Joint Vaccine Acquisition Program. Mr. Secretary, is it [the] policy of the U.S. Government to reward companies that traffic in women and little girls?”
The response and McKinney’s comeback was as follows.
Rumsfeld: “Thank you, Representative. First, the answer to your first question is, is, no, absolutely not, the policy of the United States Government is clear, unambiguous, and opposed to the activities that you described. The second question.”
McKinney: “Well how do you explain the fact that Dyncorp and its successor companies have received and continue to receive government contracts?”
Rumsfeld: “I would have to go and find the facts, but there are laws and rules and regulations with respect to government contracts, and there are times that corporations do things they should not do, in which case they tend to be suspended for some period; there are times then that the – under the laws and the rules and regulations for the – passed by the Congress and implemented by the Executive branch – that corporations can get off of – out of the penalty box if you will, and be permitted to engage in contracts with the government. They’re generally not barred in perpetuity.”
McKinney: “This contract – this company – was never in the penalty box.”
Rumsfeld: “I’m advised by DR. Chu that it was not the corporation that was engaged in the activities you characterized but I’m told it was an employee of the corporation, and it was some years ago in the Balkans that that took place.”

Rumsfeld’s effort to shift the blame away from the hierarchy at Dyncorp and onto the Dyncorp employees was a blatant attempt to hide the fact that human trafficking and sex slavery is a practice condoned by companies like Dyncorp and Halliburton subsidiaries like KBR.
Why should the UN be continually allowed to investigate itself and, those that it contracts, on these issues? The UN has an abysmal track record on this issue and a long history of covering up such cases. It is time for a thorough independent inquiry of the UN and its agencies and affiliates to be carried out.

http://a-sheep-no-more.blogspot.com/2013/09/the-shocking-details-of-un-their-child.html

Facebooktwitterrss
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!