Category Archives: Media

Piers Morgan: Now I see U.S. Government Tyranny – Gun Rights Advocates May Have A Point

Is British CNN host Piers Morgan finally admitting gun advocates have a point when they say the Second Amendment is to protect citizens from tyrannical government?

Ladies and gentlemen  I have a brief announcement for you. Breaking news: Hell has just frozen over and flying monkeys have been spotted flying over Cleveland. Piers Morgan has admitted that the government’s behavior is bordering on tyrannical and that gun control advocates have a point when they say they need guns due to the possibility of government tyranny.

Morgan has made headlines for many months as he loudly trumpeted the cause of gun control, even to the detriment of his shows ratings.

Since the Sandy Hook massacre last year – in which Adam Lanza shot and killed 20 students and six adults at an elementary school in Newtown, Conn. – Morgan has made advocating for gun-control legislation a frequent topic of his program, clashing with former House Speaker Newt Gingrich or rocker and National Rifle Association board member Ted Nugent, for example, and calling Gun Owners of America’s Larry Pratt “an unbelievably stupid man” for disagreeing with him.

Following reports of his vitriolic attacks, a petition was started on the White House “We the People” website demanding Morgan be deported back to England – and it now has more than 109,000 signatures.

As WND reported, despite his avid criticism of guns, Morgan protects his own personal property with signs warning that it is guarded by “Armed Response Security Systems,” according to a recent investigation by self-described “guerrilla journalist” James O’Keefe.

And on March 11, Morgan insisted that, “people need the nanny state occasionally.”

Now – after learning of the Obama administration’s involvement in the IRS’ targeting of conservative groups and its secret seizure of Associated Press phone records – the CNN host admitted to guest Penn Jillette that perhaps gun advocates were right about creeping tyranny after all:

“I’ve had some of the pro-gun lobbyists on here, saying to me, ‘Well, the reason we need to be armed is because of tyranny from our own government,’ and I’ve always laughed at them,” Morgan said. “I said, ‘Don’t be ridiculous! Your government won’t turn itself on you. …

“But, actually, this is vaguely tyrannical behavior by the American government.”

He continued, “I think what the IRS did is bordering on tyrannical behavior. I think what the Department of Justice has done to the AP is bordering on tyrannical behavior.”

Jillette agreed with Morgan, stating, “There’s no doubt about that. Once you use the word ‘bordering,’  that’s ‘true’.

“I also think that it shows you that how much we can trust the government and just sit back– which is not very much at all. We have to be ever vigilant.”



If you don’t think like the crowd, it’s not called “Independent Thought” – it’s a mental illness

government power - attracts corruption


You heard right. If you question your government, think differently from the crowd, don’t just go along to get along… in fact, if you aren’t just a lazy thinker and a zombie, it’s probably an illness… a really MENTAL one.

If your local government says, “We are going to double  your taxes and put you in jail if you don’t pay.” Then you better just say, “Yes, Sir!” and pay up. If your government convinces enough citizens that no one should own any property and it’s all for the greater good, then you shouldn’t really think any differently from them. If you do, it’s because you’re sick in the head, not them. No matter what they do, they are right and you are wrong if you disagree.

For instance… NOW its OK to say that the IRS was targeting people who opposed the current administration. It’s OK because now the media says it so it must be true. However BEFORE it was public knowledge and on the news every day, if you had said the same thing then, it was because you were mental.

When you thought that the government sponsored terror before anyone else did, that was a mental illness. But NOW you can say that it might be true because Benghazi. Now you are not mental for thinking the same thing you thought before because now some higher profile people think it.

Here’s an article from Off The Grid News that explains this extremely odd type of illness that changes depending on what everyone else thinks in much greater detail:


If you don’t think like the crowd, it’s not called “Independent Thought” – it’s a mental illness.

Is nonconformity and freethinking a mental illness? According to the newest addition of the DSM-IV (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders), it certainly is. The manual identifies a new mental illness called “oppositional defiant disorder” or ODD. Defined as an “ongoing pattern of disobedient, hostile and defiant behavior,” symptoms include questioning authority, negativity, defiance, argumentativeness, and being easily annoyed.

The DSM-IV is the manual used by psychiatrists to diagnose mental illnesses and, with each new edition, there are scores of new mental illnesses. Are we becoming sicker? Is it getting harder to be mentally healthy? Authors of the DSM-IV say that it’s because they’re better able to identify these illnesses today. Critics charge that it’s because they have too much time on their hands.

New mental illnesses identified by the DSM-IV include arrogance, narcissism, above-average creativity, cynicism, and antisocial behavior. In the past, these were called “personality traits,” but now they’re diseases.

And there are treatments available.

All of this is a symptom of our over-diagnosing and overmedicating culture. In the last 50 years, the DSM-IV has gone from 130 to 357 mental illnesses. A majority of these illnesses afflict children. Although the manual is an important diagnostic tool for the psychiatric industry, it has also been responsible for social changes. The rise in ADD, bipolar disorder, and depression in children has been largely because of the manual’s identifying certain behaviors as symptoms. A Washington Post article observed that, if Mozart were born today, he would be diagnosed with ADD and “medicated into barren normality.”

According to the DSM-IV, the diagnosis guidelines for identifying oppositional defiant disorder are for children, but adults can just as easily suffer from the disease. This should give any freethinking American reason for worry.

The Soviet Union used new “mental illnesses” for political repression. People who didn’t accept the beliefs of the Communist Party developed a new type of schizophrenia. They suffered from the delusion of believing communism was wrong. They were isolated, forcefully medicated, and put through repressive “therapy” to bring them back to sanity.

When the last edition of the DSM-IV was published, identifying the symptoms of various mental illnesses in children, there was a jump in the diagnosis and medication of children. Some states have laws that allow protective agencies to forcibly medicate, and even make it a punishable crime to withhold medication. This paints a chilling picture for those of us who are nonconformists.

Although the authors of the manual claim no ulterior motives but simply better diagnostic practices, the labeling of freethinking and nonconformity as mental illnesses has a lot of potential for abuse. It can easily become a weapon in the arsenal of a repressive state.

If you liked this article you may be interested in this product from our sponsor.


Liberal College Blogger Threatens To Rape Herself and Frames Conservatives

News media manipulation and lies

Forgive me for interjecting just a bit, but the older I become, the more I grow convinced that liberalism is an undeniable mental disorder.

Perhaps nowhere is this more perfectly illustrated than when it comes to a bizarre story surrounding a well known liberal blogger and radio host the University of Wyoming.

Last week, an obscene message was posted on a University of Wyoming Facebook page in which an unnamed conservative individual appeared to threaten to rape Meg Lanker-Simons for no other reason than because she was a liberal blogger.

“I want to hate f**k Meg Lanker-Simons so hard. That chick that runs her liberal mouth all the time and doesn’t care who knows it,” it read.  “I think its hot and it makes me angry. One night with me and shes gonna be a good Republican bitch,” the post read.

Not too much later, Lanker-Simons responded to the post, calling it “disgusting, misogynistic, and apparently something the admins of this page think is a perfectly acceptable sentiment.”

She also encouraged the poster to seek help at the UW Counseling service and ends with the advice:

“Instead of focusing on how angry and turned on me ‘running my mouth’ makes you, perhaps you should listen instead. You might learn something.”

The event quickly garnered national media attention and prompted hundreds of people to gather on the campus of the university Monday in a show of support for the liberal blogger, who was suffering from the conservative state’s ”rape culture.”

Today, however, it was revealed that the entire threat of rape was merely a hoax, put on by liberal blogger herself:

News media manipulation and liesThe University of Wyoming Police Department issued a citation to Lanker-Simons for “interference” for “false statements she made to the UW Police Department.”

Subject admitted to making a controversial post on UW Crushes webpage and then lied about not doing it,” according to the citation.

The University of Wyoming also confirmed a statement that the police had “’obtained substantial evidence verifying that the offending Facebook post came from Lanker-Simons’ computer, while the computer was in her possession.”

According to a Facebook page that apparently belongs to Lanker-Simons she is a member of the University of Wyoming Gender & Women’s Studies group as well as the school’s chapter of The Nonviolent Communist.

Since police cited her, supporters have a constructed a Facebook page entitled “Meg Lanker-Simons is innocent.”

“Meg Lanker-Simons is innocent we believe what she did was justified and deserves not to be held accountable for her accusations we stand behind you sister,” reads that page’s description.

Lanker-Simons was in the news in 2010 when she was a plaintiff in a successful lawsuit against UW after it retracted its invitation to have Bill Ayers speak on campus.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!