Tag Archives: conspiracy theory

The Great Depression was Deliberately Created by the Federal Reserve As Well As Every Depression Since

1913 us federal reserve one hundred years of bankrupting your nation

The Great Depression was Deliberately Created by the Federal Reserve and so was Every Depression Since

Apparently congress was aware of the scheme of the international bankers and recognized the danger that the republic was in. Congressman Lindberg said in a Congressional Record dated, December 22, 1913, vol. 51, “This new law [the Federal Reserve Act] will create inflation whenever the trusts want inflation. It may not do so immediately, but … if the trusts can get another period of inflation, they figure they can unload the stocks on the people at high prices during the excitement and them bring on a panic and buy them back at low prices… The people may not know it immediately, but the day of reckoning is only a few years removed.”

“That day of reckoning, of course, came in 1929,” said Perloff, “and the Federal Reserve has since created an endless series of booms and busts by the strategic tightening and relaxation of money and credit.” Speaking about the historical disinformation regarding the crash, Perloff said, “Establishment historians present the ’29 stock market crash as they do most events: an accident, evolved from erroneous policies, not from deliberate planning. We have all heard how foolish speculation bid stock prices high, but that the bubble finally burst, plunging brokers out of windows and America into the Depression.”

“Having built the Federal Reserve as a tool to consolidate and control wealth, the international bankers were now ready to make a major killing,” stated Allen. Between 1923 and 1929,” he described, “the Federal Reserve expanded (inflated) the money supply by sixty-two percent. Much of this new money was used to bid the stock market up to dizzying heights. At the same time that enormous amounts of credit money were being made available,” continued Allen, “the mass media began to ballyhoo tales of instant riches to be made in the stock market. According to Ferdinand Lundberg: ‘For profits to be made on these funds the public had to be induced to speculate, and it was so induced by misleading newspaper accounts, many of them bought and paid for by the brokers that operated the pools.'”

Perloff concurred, writing, “The Federal Reserve prompted the speculation by expanding the money supply a whopping sixty-two percent between 1923 and 1929. When the central bank became law in 1913, Congressman Charles Lindbergh had warned:

‘From now on, depressions will be scientifically created.’

Like two con men working a mark, the Fed made credit easy while Establishment newspapers hyped what riches could be made in the stock market.” “Curtis Dall,” he continued, “himself a syndicate manager for Lehman Brothers was on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange on the day of the Crash.” Perloff quotes Dall as declaring, “Actually, it was the calculated ‘shearing’ of the public by the World-Money powers triggered by the planned sudden shortage of call money in the New York money market.”

The “shearing,” wrote Allen, caused a “despair [which] produced a willingness to accept a major expansion of government controls over the economy. … In 1929, America was a long way from total government.” He advised, “The next depression will be used as the excuse for complete socialist-fascist controls at home and the creation of a World Superstate internationally.”

Congressman Louis McFadden, Chairman of the House Banking Committee, declared of the Depression, “It was not accidental. It was a carefully contrived occurrence.” He warned, “The international bankers sought to bring about a condition of despair here so that they might emerge as rulers of us all.” The Great Depression is another example of the Problem-Reaction-Solutionformula.

“Plummeting stock prices ruined small investors, but not the top “insiders” on Wall Street,” wrote Perloff. “Paul Warburg had issued a tip in March of 1929 that the crash was coming. Before it did, John D. Rockefeller, Bernard Baruch, Joseph P. Kennedy, and other money barons got out of the market. … Early withdrawal from the market not only preserved the fortunes of these men,” said Perloff, “it also enabled them to return later and buy up whole companies for a song.”

“History shows that the Wall Street biggies came through very well indeed,” wrote Alan B. Jones in his book, How the World Really Works. Quoting from G. Edward Griffin’s book, The Creature from Jekyll Island, he added, “Virtually all of the inner club was rescued. There is no record of any member of the interlocking directorate between the Federal Reserve, the major New York banks, and their prime customers having been caught by surprise.” Pictured below is a bread line in New York City during the Great Depression. Apparently the Wall Street insiders didn’t require this service.(*)

Bread Line The great depression was deliberately created and every depression since

Bread Line During The Great Depression

Jones quotes Herbert Hoover’s description of the Secretary of the Treasury, Andrew Mellon’s views, “Mr. Mellon had only one formula: ‘Liquidate labor, liquidate stocks, liquidate the farmers, [and] liquidate real estate.'” [Mellon] said, “It will purge the rottenness out of the system. Values will be adjusted, and enterprising people will pick up the wrecks from less competent people.”

“For those who knew the score,” stated Allen, “a comment by Paul Warburg had provided the warning to sell. That signal came on March 9, 1929, when the Financial Chronicle quoted Warburg as giving this sound advice: ‘If orgies of unrestricted speculation are permitted to spread too far … the ultimate collapse is certain … to bring about a general depression involving the whole country.'” “Sharpies [insiders] were later able to buy back these stocks at a ninety percent discount from their former highs,” he declared.

“FDR is probably best remembered for the New Deal,” stated Perloff. “Of courser, since a large portion of the work force was unemployed, there was not enough tax revenue to pay for these programs. So the government turned to its other source–borrowing. In effect, the international bankers, having created the Depression, now loaned America the cash to recover from it.” He added, “Naturally, the interest on these loans would be borne on the backs of taxpayers for years to come.”

The great depression was created deliberately and every depression since Migration

No Work During the Great Depression

The migration of families & individuals due to lack of jobs was evidently common during the Great Depression. Encyclopedia Britannica describes the Great Depression as the “Longest and most severe economic depression ever experienced,” which “precipitated economic failures around the world” and triggered “major changes in the structure of the U.S. economy.” “To think that the scientifically engineered Crash of ’29 was an accident or the result of stupidity defies all logic,” concluded Allen.

Summary

This evidence suggests that The Great Depression was artificially created so the larger Wall Street firms, which control the stock market, could eliminate competition and make profits out of lending America money to recover from it.

“Competition is a sin.”
-John D. Rockefeller

http://www.thehiddenevil.com/crash.asp

Facebooktwitterrss

Obama Failed E-Verify | NOT Qualified To Pick Tomatoes But OK to be President

E-Verify 'flags' Obama's Social Security Number

It’s official. Obama’s social security number is a fraud. He can’t pick tomatoes in Florida or Cabbage in California. He can’t get a job in the United States because he doesn’t have a valid social security number.

The good news? It probably won’t disqualify him for food stamps.

The bad news? The president of the United States of America is a fraud. The guy with access to the “nuke” button on the biggest nuclear arsenal in the world has only gotten where he due to deception.

No wonder he’s so anxious to pass legislation that decriminalizes social security fraud.

The woman who ran Obama’s social security number through the E-verify system, the same social security number that Obama has been using for years, took the case to court and the judges refused to look at it. Instead it was instantly thrown out as “frivolous”. AND Because it was SOOOO frivolous that no one with a brain would ever think even for one second that Obama isn’t the honest, hard-working, upstanding, qualified, Columbia College Educated, brilliant, humble, valid birth certificate having, American citizen president that he appears to be, she was fined $13,000 for ever having brought it to the courts attention to begin with.

A private investigation reveals that the Social Security Number being used by Barack Obama does not pass a check with E-Verify, the electronic system the U.S. Citizenship and Immigrations Services of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security has created to verify whether or not prospective employees have the required authorization to work legally in the United States.

Over the past few years, the E-Verify system has received national attention because of its ability to determine if prospective employees are illegal immigrants who have entered the United States without the legal authority to work.

Autographed copies of Jerome Corsi’s “Where’s the Birth Certificate?” are available only from the WND Superstore

By flagging fraudulent documents, including faked Social Security Numbers, the E-Verify system can assist an employer in the effort to make sure all prospective hires have authentic identification papers, including valid Social Security Numbers, issued to them and not to someone else.

Now WND has obtained a copy of an affidavit from Linda Jordan, a private citizen who entered Obama’s Social Security Number into the “Self Check” section of the E-Verify website, only to find out that Obama’s Social Security Number was flagged by E-Verify as likely being fraudulent.

The document:

E-Verify 'flags' Obama's Social Security Number

E-Verify ‘flags’ Obama’s Social Security Number

 

E-Verify 'flags' Obama's Social Security Number

E-Verify ‘flags’ Obama’s Social Security Number

 

http://www.wnd.com/2011/09/344461/

Facebooktwitterrss

THE AFTERMATH OF PROP 8 – Pedophilia becoming a separate sexual orientation

normalizing pedophillia pedophiles sexual orientation

THE AFTERMATH OF PROP 8 – Pedophilia becoming a separate sexual orientation

Decadence is on the march! And now, a defense of pedophilia as just another “sexual orientation” has been published in the mainstream left wing UK newspaper The Guardian.  From, “Paedophilia: Bringing Dark Desires Into the Light:”

Paedophiles may be wired differently. This is radical stuff. But there is a growing conviction, notably in Canada, that paedophilia should probably be classified as a distinct sexual orientation, like heterosexuality or homosexuality. Two eminent researchers testified to that effect to a Canadian parliamentary commission last year, and the Harvard Mental Health Letter of July 2010 stated baldly that paedophilia “is a sexual orientation” and therefore “unlikely to change”.

This isn’t news. We already know that those who abuse children sexually are always dangerous. That is why they must register with the police when released from prison.

Understanding causes is one thing–I’m all for it–but the effort is definitely underway to normalize the behavior:

The reclassification of paedophilia as a sexual orientation would, however, play into what Goode calls “the sexual liberation discourse”, which has existed since the 1970s. “There are a lot of people,” she says, “who say: we outlawed homosexuality, and we were wrong. Perhaps we’re wrong about paedophilia.”

Social perceptions do change. Child brides were once the norm; in the late 16th century the age of consent in England was 10. More recently, campaigning organisations of the 70s and 80s such as the Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE) and Paedophile Action for Liberation were active members of the NCCL when it made its parliamentary submission questioning the lasting damage caused by consensual paedophilic relations… A Dutch study published in 1987 found that a sample of boys in paedophilic relationships felt positively about them. And a major if still controversial 1998-2000 meta-study suggests – as J Michael Bailey of Northwestern University, Chicago, says – that such relationships, entered into voluntarily, are “nearly uncorrelated with undesirable outcomes”.

Read more: http://nation.foxnews.com/pedophilia/2013/01/07/normalizing-pedophilia#ixzz2XNiGgvpz

If you’re grateful that the media is still able to publicize this ridiculous nonsense so that more people can become aware and do something about it, then please protest the repealing of the first amendment bill sponsored by 41 Democrats and 1 Socialist in congress.

Facebooktwitterrss
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!