Tag Archives: police state

Women Sue Over Public Body Cavity Searches | They Don’t Need a Reason to Molest You In Public

women sue over body cavity searches

Texas Department of “Justice” officers apparently don’t need a compelling reason to stick their hands down your pants or fingers in your private parts In full view of traffic beside the highway in broad daylight with cars full of random strangers zooming by.

If this sounds like possibly one of those urban legends that couldn’t have happened because it’s just too bizarre, ridiculous and over-the-top to have happened, then think again. It was all caught on the troopers dash-cam. And, actually, this wasn’t the first time that a body cavity search was done on two women with the same glove in Texas beside a busy highway. In that case it was due to suspicion of marijuana and none was found. This is obviously a flagrant disregard for constitutional rights, but it’s also bad policy that is going to cost taxpayers a bundle. It’s even more unnerving than forcing women to shake their bra out while lifting their shirt as reported recently.

So let’s get this straight… In the “land of the free”, if “they” say they found a small amount of marijuana (possibly dropped by your slacker brother or some acquaintance you gave a ride to the store or something), it’s a perfectly legitimate reason for someone with little to no medical training to use the same rubber glove to go in any and all orifices of your body at their discretion with no oversight from a superior or protocol (or sanitation)?

Uh… Sounds reasonable…

 

Women Sue Over Public Body Cavity Searches.

…And remember… “they hate us for our Freedom”…

BRAZORIA COUNTY, TX — Two women had the inside of their crotches (orifices)  searched on the side of the highway, thanks to the dutiful enforcement of tyrannical drug prohibition laws.

Officers pulled the women over for speeding on their way home from the beach. Of course, traffic stops are just the excuse a good enforcer needs to begin fishing for reasons to throw people in cages.

After finding a small amount of forbidden plants in the vehicle, officer Nathaniel Turner, wasn’t satisfied. He wanted more. The two women, dressed only in bikinis, were told they were going to get an internal body cavity search. He called a female trooper to search their genitalia for drugs on the side of Highway 288 in Brazoria County

“Are you serious,” Brandy Hamilton asked the trooper.

“If you hid something in there, we’re going to find it,” said the trooper.

“You’re going to go up my private parts?!” Hamilton said.

“Yes ma’am.”

The women say that the same glove was used to violate all of their orifices.

women sue over body cavity searches

Women Sue Over Body Cavity Searches Beside Highway In Daylight

There are truly no limits to the amount of terror and tyranny that are created by the fascist Drug War that plagues the country.

“These police officers are here to protect and serve,” said Hamilton. “They did not protect me at all. Not one of them, and it was three officers out there.”

Brandy Hamilton and Alexandria Randle are suing the officers involved.

SHARE THIS!!!!
www.youtube.com/watch?v=gI6VHn5_7os

Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime/texas-women-sue-humiliating-body-cavity-searches-roadside-article-1.1390230#ixzz2Y6wIDJOF

If you enjoy knowing what’s going on in the world, please defend the First Amendment that 41 Democrats and 1 Socialist in the senate have voted to repeal. 

Facebooktwitterrss

Police Chief Negligently Shoots Womans Leg Trying to Kill Her Dog then Ignores Her to Make a Phone Call

Police chief shoots woman negligentlly trying to kill dog and ignores injury

These incidents are becoming all too frequent and are often unwarranted and unnecessary. At least this time police had, what I would consider to be, a legitimate reason to be there. They had received a call that stated a man was pointing a large gun at another person in a threatening manner.

When the police arrived, the dog approached Chief Roundtree in what he says was a “threatening manner”. When he missed the dog, the bullet hit the sidewalk and ricocheted into Tarmara Whitt’s leg. She says the dog was closer to her than the officer and that’s why the bullet struck her in the leg when it missed the dog. She says her dog is very passive and wasn’t acting aggressive.

I can’t help but wonder if there was ever a man pointing a gun at someone on the porch in a threatening manner and why.
Although he’s on administrative leave at the moment, Assistant Chief Roundtree is due to be sworn in as scheduled.

Police Chief Shoots at Dog, Bullet Ricocheted Into Woman’s Leg

WINSTON-SALEM, NC — Tamara Whitt said that she couldn’t understand why incoming Police Chief Barry Rountree would take the chance of firing his weapon while she was standing so close to the “very passive” dog. As the boxer came toward Rountree to investigate, he shot a round at the dog, which ricocheted off the pavement and into Whitt’s leg. The bullet remains lodged in her leg as it was too dangerous to remove.

The story gets even more infuriating when we learn of how the chief acted after shooting the woman. She says he walked away without even asking if she was OK. “He did not come to me. He backed away,” says Tamara Whitt after being released from the hospital. “He just backed up and I saw the cell phone come out … he walked across the street over there by that car over there and he was on his phone.”

“I just hope that the SBI does a good investigation and really sees if he really deserve to be our police [chief] because I honestly thought that was a rookie mistake.”

http://myfox8.com/2013/06/26/crews-on-the-scene-of-officer-involved-shooting-in-winston-salem/

 

Facebooktwitterrss

Answers to Objections When You Talk About Islam Part 1 | But it is just a small minority of extremists

if republicans or democrats forced women to wear burkas we would be outraged

BELOW IS A LIST of responses you are likely to get when talking about the terrifying brilliance of Islam to someone who knows little about it. The responses link to an article giving you suggestions about how to effectively respond.

The good news is that the responses you will typically get are a fairly small number. You’ll hear the same few objections over and over (1-7 are the most common). When you have some good answers to these objections ready at hand, you will be able to answer smoothly and with poise, without feeling tense or antagonistic.

When you talk about Islamic supremacism with people, they are likely to say one of the following:

1. But it is just a small minority of extremists.

Muslim-man-4When you get a job as a saleperson, the trainer will usually teach you about the most common objections customers have, and hopefully will teach you how to handle them. Then when a potential customer gives you one of those objections, you won’t be thrown off; you’ll have a competent and well-thought-out answer — an answer that will satisfy the person making it.

But maybe even more important, you’ll give an answer that will satisfy the person your customer will talk to later. In fact, the objection may only be what your customer thinks others will ask later about his purchase.

People often make a response that they think other people might make. This is true in sales, and it’s true when you’re talking about Islam’s relentless encroachment.

If your listener accepts what you’re saying about Islam, and then they go share what they’ve learned with a friend of theirs, what objection might that friend come up with? Your listener will probably wonder about that, and might bring up that objection to see if you have a good answer for it — a persuasive answer, a satisfying answer, an answer that would even convince their skeptical friend.

If you have a good enough answer, you can go further into the conversation with a willing listener. If you don’t have a good enough answer, the conversation will stall and maybe stop, and your listener’s mind will close, maybe for now, and maybe forever.

Not many people really want to hear about Islamic supremacism, at least at first. It’s ugly and it’s scary. But if you do well enough in your conversation, you can get some good information into the other person’s brain, and we will all be better off. This is the most important thing that needs to be done right now: SUCCESSFUL one-on-one conversations between people who know about Islam and people who don’t.

But, as you have undoubtedly discovered, when you initiate these conversations, people will often respond negatively. The good news is that the number of possible negative responses you get is limited. There aren’t an unlimited number of things people will say to you. There are only six that are very common. My complete list is only eighteen objections, and the list covers, by my estimate, 98 percent of all the responses you can possibly get.

People will present their responses as if that’s the end of the argument. Case closed. As far as they are concerned, they just gave the final word on the subject. But if you have a good answer, the conversation can go on, and can go deeper, and your listener will walk away more informed about the third jihad. That’s one less potential dhimmi in the world; one more recruit to our side.

So let’s begin. The first response on our list is: “You seem to be indicting the whole religion. It is really just a small minority of extremists who have hijacked the religion.” Have you ever heard this?

In other words, you’ll be talking about Islam and what it says in the Qur’an, and they’ll come back with, “You’re talking about a minority within Islam.”

This is the biggest misconception people have — that Islamic supremacists are terrorists and they’re small in number and a fringe group, and that the vast majority of Muslims are peaceful, law-abiding, kind-hearted, religiously-tolerant believers in humans rights. How can you respond? Here are a five different ways to answer:

1. Even a small minority of 1.3 billion people is still a lot of people. And the minority is not nearly as small as people like to think. Yes, the number of Muslims following Mohammad’s command to “kill unbelievers wherever you find them” may be small, but a much much larger percentage believes in the political purpose of Islam and is working toward that goal in other ways besides terrorism. There are many ways to wage jihad. Violence is only one. Demographics is another (that is, immigrate to a new country, maybe even let them support you with welfare, but definitely out-breed the original inhabitants, build up a politically-active and powerful voting block of Muslims in that country, and then start pressing for concessions). Many forms of jihad are possible — litigation jihadforest fire jihadfalsify textbooks jihad, and the list goes on and on. Violent Islamic supremacists may, in fact, be the least of our problems.

2. You mean the ones who are blowing themselves up in order to kill non-Muslims? Or flying planes into buildings? Or trying to get their hands on a nuclear bomb so they can set it off in downtown New York City? Those are worthy of concern, but in the longer term, the Muslims waging jihad by other means may be more dangerous. (Of course, at this point, they’ll probably say, “What other means?” and you have opened up another opportunity to educate them further.)

3. Jihad is obligatory for all Muslims. Jihad doesn’t mean only violence. Jihad means to struggle, in whatever way you can, to achieve Islam’s single political goal: The subjugation of all non-Muslims to Islamic law. That political goal is a Muslim’s religious duty. Mohammad didn’t approve of meditation or navel-gazing. He said the way you can prove your devotion to Allah is by action. So even mainstream “moderate” Muslims are active, constantly working toward the end-goal of worldwide Islamic dominance. They do it by paying their zakat, which goes to the mosque, which goes to supporting Muslim causes (which are almost entirely political causes). And they do it by having lots of children, to give Muslims a demographic advantage in democratic countries. They do it by making every non-Muslim they meet think that Muslims are harmless and well-meaning. They do it by crying “racism” every time someone criticizes Islam, even though they know full well Islam is not a race (they say it because it gets the desired response: It shuts people up). They do it by writing to every television or radio program that portrays Islam in an unflattering light. It is all jihad. Bamboozling the non-Muslims is jihad. As Mohammad said, “War is deceit.” And as you can see, they have been winning the war. You, like most other non-Muslims, know almost nothing about Islam and yet have a feeling that it must be all right.

4. We get that impression (that it is a small number of extremists) because almost none of the constant attacks by Jihadis are covered in the media. Go to thereligionofpeace.com and you can see every verifiable attack in the world made in the name of Islam. There are about five attacks a day. Some big, some small. But it adds up to a constant war being waged against all non-Muslims everywhere in the world simultaneously. More people are being killed in the name of Islam per year than were killed in the entire 350 years of the Spanish Inquisition. And each one of the Jihadis doing the killing is supported by a network of Muslims that, while they are not killers themselves, help to make it happen, help to finance it, help to hide them, feed them, encourage them, and protect them. And the ones committing violent jihad are only the tip of the iceberg. In many other ways, many more Muslims are following Mohammad’s example and waging jihad on many fronts and at many levels at once.

5. The Muslim Brotherhood is the largest Islamic organization of any kind in the world. That makes it mainstream. Not fringe. The Brotherhood’s goal is to make the whole world submit to Islamic law. And they are actively (and in many ways successfully) accomplishing their goal. Most of them do not advocate random bombings, which are strategically ineffective in most places and counterproductive to the goal of world domination. They have a long-range plan and they’ve been putting it into effect for over twenty years. This is not guesswork. Their documents have been seized in FBI raids. One such raid recently led to the prosecution of members of the Holy Land Foundation. The Muslim Brotherhood has established lots of “legitimate” organizations in the United States, which work toward the goal of destroying our government and the western civilisation from within (this is their stated goal) — CAIR, MSA, ISNA, NAIT, etc. They raise money to promote jihad (while fooling people as to the real purpose of the money), they sue on behalf of Islam, they recruit on campuses and turn non-Muslim students against America, they influence how textbooks in American schools portray Islam, they influence how the FBI deals with Muslims, they fund and control madrassas and mosques all over America and make sure they teach hatred, intolerance, and non-integration. And more. And they do it all under our noses because our attention is focused out on the hot-headed Jihadis who are blowing things up. Read more about the Muslim Brotherhood’s goals here.

That is our list of good responses — responses that will satisfy most listeners, and allow your conversation to continue productively.  Let’s find the best ways to get through to people and prevent our conversations from being stopped by seemingly-sound arguments simply because we were not prepared.

Read over these responses again and pick the one you would most want to use, and remind yourself of it every day until it comes to mind naturally. I recommend using the reminder service, Resnooze. Or read it onto an audio file and listen to it in your car while you drive. Let’s prepare ourselves for these conversations so they can go well. People who don’t know MUST BE REACHED! It is up to us. Let’s get it done.

Read more: What Muslim Leaders Say About Islam Dispels the Myth that Jihadists are a “Fringe” Element.

Facebooktwitterrss
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!